Media needs to stop sitting on the sidelines
I am not a person for platforms. I prefer to be the one behind the notebook and pen trying to make sense of the world and all its madness. But I feel passionate enough about the topic to put myself through this stressful experience!
The brief of this panel was to chat about the ARV roll-out, the much disputed figures of 53 000 referring to the number of people Government said would be on ARVs by the end of the month, the challenges facing Government in rolling out their plan, the perceived lack of political will versus the real problems they may be facing with implementation, the consequences of the delay and the role the media have to play in all of this.
Most of the above I left to my fellow panelists to deal with and I will try to share my thoughts on my experiences in covering this epidemic over the past few years.
53 000. A figure that has become a symbol for whether we are succeeding in dealing with this epidemic or not. It is a significant figure because if we achieve in placing 53 000 people on ARVs, it would be a world first.
It could have been another record in terms of the Aids epidemic that we can add to the list of having the highest number of People living with HIV/Aids and the largest prevention of mother to child transmission programme in the world.
I am not a member of the roll-out choir in that I do not believe it is the ultimate solution. Obviously I do believe in the merits of providing ARVs to those people who need it, in areas where they are ready to provide it, to a community that is ready to accept it and our track record at Health-e bares testimony to this.
I believe ARVs should be the cherry on top of a programme that deals with among others prevention, keeping people who are HIV positive healthy until they have no other option, but to use the drugs and to make sure they have followed a process which empowers them to not default on their medication.
Read more here: Panel discussion.pdf
Author
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
Media needs to stop sitting on the sidelines
by ansothom, Health-e News
April 29, 2013